I see that Tony Blair has appointed the hotshot Washington lawyer, Bob Barnett, to get a deal for his memoirs. There is little doubt that this will be an important and big-selling book and that the forthcoming auction will be interesting, to say the least.

There are many variables and imponderables in calculating what advance to offer. When will the book be published? How good will it be? How revealing or otherwise? How much would a newspaper pay for serialization? What might be the scope and size of translation rights? How well might the book sell in the UK and USA? How much would the publisher have to set aside for security and management diversion?

As an aid to all the publishers who might be bidding can I invite you to suggest:

1. How much should be the top offer for world rights?

2. How much will be the top offer for world rights?

3. Which publisher will triumph?

Over to you.

And here is a link to an amazing tribute to Bill Deedes.

There is a school of thought (particularly prevalent in the UK) which says that 'educated' people must be able to discuss literature and politics (and maybe business, wine, food, sport etc). Equally however, it is considered quite cool (or certainly not shocking) to claim almost total ignorance of science. 'Popular science' is frequently a contradiction in terms.

Of course, issues like climate change, the Internet, genetic engineering, and health issues have started to make basic scientific understanding a 'must' but the level of discussion among even 'well-educated' people is pretty embarrassingly poor.

Macmillan Science has published some great books trying to address this. The latest is Ten Questions Science Can't Answer (Yet) by Michael Hanlon.

Books like this make a difference but in addition I'd like to point you to News at Nature. Without any dumbing down, this site allows non-scientists to discover what's happening at the cutting edge of research. It is really the most authoritative and accessible source of scientific news and fulfils the first part of Nature's two-pronged mission 'to place before the general public the grand results of Scientific Work and Scientific Discovery; and to urge the claims of Science to a more general recognition in Education and in Daily Life'. This comes from the first page of the first issue in 1869. A more recent mission statement can be found here although an editorial about it has started a bit of a flurry in the blogosphere (which incorrectly is commenting about an amended version of the 1869 statement - oh what fun we have):

First, to serve scientists through prompt publication of significant advances in any branch of science, and to provide a forum for the reporting and discussion of news and issues concerning science. Second, to ensure that the results of science are rapidly disseminated to the public throughout the world, in a fashion that conveys their significance for knowledge, culture and daily life.

One of the most difficult parts of being part of a very international business is trying to be aware of the problems affecting each of our businesses, both commercial and environmental. Clearly on September 11, 2001 everyone rushed to establish whether their colleagues, friends and family were safe. It becomes harder when the disaster is less globally newsworthy or in a more distant culture or geography. The earthquake in Peru is an example. We have a small but hugely committed Macmillan Education business in Lima. Thank goodness all our team are safe but of course they all know people caught up in the tragedy and the after effects could be as bad as the disaster itself.

Obituaries of Bill Deedes are still flying off the presses. I particularly liked this tribute by Alan Watkins in today's Independent on Sunday where he quotes the wonderful Deedesian mixed metaphor: 'You can't make an omelette without frying eggs.' I couldn't agree more.

One of Macmillan's most loyal and most entertaining authors, Bill Deedes, died yesterday. For more about him just follow this link to today's vast number of news stories. Even better, sample one of his books the most recent of which has just come out in paperback with the author aged 94.

While being distracted by old issues of Macmillan News the other day this came up as the banner illustration.

Macmillan's former Chairman is pretty recognisable but I wonder how many people now recognise the other guy. I'm pretty sure that it's Clive Sinclair the British inventor. I think he's demonstrating one of his ZX Spectrum computers for use in schools back in the early 1980s. Clearly the digital revolution began early at Macmillan.

Two links for those interested in the future of educational publishing. University Publishing in a Digital Age is a report written by an old friend and former head of Oxford University Press USA, Laura Brown, principally about the university press sector in the America. It's a strange thing but, whilst British university presses are among the most successful and vibrant publishers in the world, their American equivalents by and large are tiny and very traditional. I think this is because the Britsh ones (OUP in particular) have been forced to stand on their own feet by virtue of the relative poverty of their owners. The American ones have traditionally received some form of support from their very wealthy owners. Subsidies don't work. Anyway, Laura's report is an excellent overview and it's well worth reading the conclusions and summaries if not the whole very long thing.

The second link is to a very basic and almost empty landing page for CourseSmart. The reason for mentioning it is that it is a very rare beast - an alliance of publishers working together to find solutions to the delivery of digital information to students. I wonder whether there should be similar initiatives elsewhere in the world...

From time to time, somebody asks me how on earth or why on earth we published a particular book. The easy thing to say is that I wasn't involved in the decision (which is true in 99% of cases) but that feels like a cop out. Ultimately, if the book carries the Macmillan or Picador (or whatever imprint) name I am responsible to some degree. I try to explain that it seems to me that there are three main criteria for deciding whether to publish a particular book, in no particular order;

It is a good book - well-written, accurate, timely etc;

It is by an author whose career we want to be associated with in the long term;

It might make money.

I don't think all three criteria have to be fulfilled on every occasion but it's usually a good idea if two of them are. I believe the bulk of what we publish passes this test. If none is fulfilled by a particular book, then the only response to a complainant is 'we got it wrong.'

What I hope we never do is make editorial decisions based on internal prejudices. There is a row brewing in the USA as described in this New York Times article. The Israel Lobby and US Foreign Policy is published by Farrar, Straus and Giroux next month. The article from which it was derived which describes how the Jewish lobby effectively controls US policy was attacked for implied anti-semitism but the team at FSG clearly think the book is important and defensible irrespective of criticism. And all power to their elbow.

Meanwhile, just a few blocks away from FSG (Union Square, New York City), the team at Palgrave Macmillan USA (Flatiron Building) are preparing for the publication of The Deadliest Lies: the Israel lobby and the myth of Jewish control which argues just the opposite as described in the NYT article.

I have no doubt that there are many people who think that one or other of these books should not have been published. Personally, I think they both fulfil all three criteria and I am proud that they are both published by companies within the Holtzbrinck Group of which Macmillan is a part. Freedom to express opinions, however controversial, is part of our role as publishers.

I am indebted to the Pan Macmillan internal blog, The Digitalist, for this link to a site about the future of education. I'd recommend that you switch off the sound unless you're into meaningless electronic musical drivel but the graphics are terrific and the messages clear.

I'm off to a meeting right now but will later today add a spot of nostalgia.

And the nostalgia comes courtesy of Alysoun Sanders who runs the Macmillan Archive in Basingstoke. If you take the trouble to checck out the links you'll also be introduced to the riches of the old newsletters which are a treasure house for historians of publishing.

Macmillan’s involvement in India from pre-Independence days to the 1990s can be found in articles that appeared in Macmillan News, the company newsletter that ran for 30 years from 1961.

At the time of independence Macmillan had 3 branches in India based in Bombay, Madras and Calcutta. K R Clemens Manager of the Calcutta branch, worked in India during the three and a half decades that bridged the last years of British India “with its endeavours and its last vestiges of pomp and circumstance, and the first twenty years of the independent Republic of India” and succeeded C A Parkhouse who had been in India with Macmillan since 1913. Clemens saw changes, which were “great and far-reaching” calling for “constant adjustments”. On his retirement in 1968 he commended “the co-operative effort that has always existed” within the company. 

David Green who succeeded  Mr Stagg as Manager of the Madras (Chennai) branch also tells his story of post-independence publishing and the growth of local publishing and nationalisation of school textbooks and the opening of showrooms in Bangalore, Hyderabad, Coimbatore, Trichinopoly and Rivandrum. The “Stories to Remember” series that began in 1954 are still on the Macmillan Education list.

In January 1970 the newly formed public company, Macmillan Company of India Ltd with its headquarters in Chennai took over the role of the 3 branches and in 1972 the main offices were moved to Delhi.

By 1979 the process of indianisation was fully implemented and the company has continued to grow and to expand into areas that were never envisaged by Alexander Macmillan when he first embarked on plans to publish a series of books especially for India more than 140 years ago in the 1860s. 

Yesterday Pakistan celebrated sixty years of statehood. Today India revels in sixty years of independence. Much will be written about the sub-continent and most of it will be much better informed than my thoughts.

I've been visiting India for twenty-five years, always (apart from the occasional day or two by the beach) on publishing business. My first visit was to the Delhi offices of Oxford University Press India in Ansari Road where they (and just down the road the editorial offices of the educational and higher education divisions of Macmillan India) are still situated.

My principal memory of that first visit was the large number of typists in the office. It was apparently cheaper to create file copies by retyping letters than by using carbon paper. Remember carbon paper? I was a medical editor at the time and India was responsible for the sale of largest number of preclinical textbooks through the British-government much missed ELBS scheme (notice that the debate was about what better scheme the Government would devise to replace ELBS - ha ha ha). We used to sell 60,000 copies of each volume of Cunningham's Manual of Practical Anatomy in India - those were the days.

Macmillan India has been operating since 1892, way before Independence but always in the Macmillan tradition of publishing independence. We now employ well over 3000 people in I don't know how many locations (probably more than a hundred if one includes showrooms etc). Pan Macmillan, Palgrave Macmillan and Nature Publishing Group all have operations in India in addition to the activities of the main Macmillan India operations. We have a printing works outside Chennai and this is what came up on a Google image search for it. We have replaced that general manager.

We have high-tech offices in Gurgaon, Delhi, Bangalore, Chennai and elsewhere where we typeset, process text, copyedit, fulfil subscriptions, build websites, develop software, innovate. The growth is astounding, the challenges enormous and the results excellent.

In the days of the Raj, India was always referred to as the jewel in the crown. For Macmillan it still is. I wish everyone in Macmillan India (and everyone in India) a great celebration and I hope I'll be there (just) to celebrate your century forty years hence.

It must be August. Yesterday's piece about author signing sessions in bookshops elicited this comment:

'It's early in the day but booksignings are best compared to sex ; sometimes more enjoyable than others, but seldom a total failure!'

Hmmm.

In the excitement of August I failed to record the millionth visit to this blog. It appears to have happened on Saturday 4 August with a VAT on print entry and some excellent comments. I can't tell exactly who the visitor was - there were 2804 visits that day, slightly below par but not bad for a weekend. So, whoever paid the millionth visit, welcome and I hope you return.

More good news on the public library front following on last week's. CILIP, which is a horrible acronym for the equally horrible-sounding but actually brilliant Chartered Institute of Librarians and Information Professionals, has come out all guns blazing in an attack on local and national politicians for the decline in support for the library services and an apparent disregard for the views of the poeple who know best, the librarians. Hooray, sense may be beginning to prevail. Here's a quote from CILIP's letter to the government minister responsible:

"A number of Public Library Authorities are planning drastic reductions in the number of professional staff they employ, and some are even planning to hand over control of library services to local community groups without any professional expertise at all," explained Bob McKee, CILIP Chief Executive. "We hear talk about improved customer service and greater community management, but this is just spin-doctoring to cover up the reality of budget cuts and job losses. The truth is that without adequate professional expertise the quality of service will be reduced and the future of the service put at risk."

Finally, hooray for the cricketers of India who won the test match series against England convincingly and properly. England's pusillanimity on the Sunday of the first test match was the trigger but then the Indian team made the most of everything that followed. The old colonial power has been put in its place by the new stars - and quite right too.