Friday, August 25, 2006

I know that this blog sometimes has spelling mistakes - mea culpa. I do try to eliminate them but I type badly and fast and make mistakes. Does it matter? Yes, it upsets me. We are a publishing company and should know how to spell and we should care about getting things right all the time. More importantly (and even more importantly in a computer age where successful searching by and large depends on accurate spelling) bad spelling causes problems.

For instance roughly half of Macmillan's internal reports used to spell Ottakers (sic). Which meant that to find out the total Ottakars sales you had to search on both spellings. It's also a bit insulting billing a customer twice because we can't decide how to spell him/her. Of course this is now a lot easier,although is it Waterstones or Waterstone's?

However, that is nothing compared to the horror I found on the main Macmillan website this morning (which I hope will be corrected by the time you read this):

Picador celebrates the inclusion of two of it's authors on the Man Booker Prize for Fiction 2006 Longlist

It was like a knife to my heart. Can everyone in Macmillan please learn the difference between it's and its - please. And if the rest of the world would follow suit I'd be a happier guy. Or is this yet another sign of fast-approaching grumpy old bookman-itis? Aaaargh.

 

#    |  Comments [15]  | 
 Thursday, August 24, 2006

On the way home earlier this week I popped in to see the bookshop co-owned by one of our regular commentators, Adam Powell. The shop is absolutely great - just what an independent bookshop should be. Good but not flash design. Interesting stock range. Intelligent and engaging staff. The problem is that Adam's customers want the best quality, the best range, the best service and the lowest prices - a difficult business proposition. From a publisher's point of view and with the best (honest) will in the world it is hard to fulfil all the needs of such a bookshop when their purchases are inevitably so much lower than those of the big chains and supermarkets. Who knows what the solution is but committed booksellers like Adam are absolutely part of it. 

But he's not always right. In his latest comment he says that record companies and publishers are reacting to rather than engaging with technological change. I guess that might be true in some instances but I don't believe it's true in general. British publishers in particular are at the forefront of embracing, using and experimenting with new models. The most difficult area in which to move quickly is where there are the most constituents with a voice. That is probably literary publishing where everyone has a vested interest, an opinion, and a right to veto - authors, agents, retailers, reviewers etc. We do need to open this up to change but, believe me, it's hard!

 

#    |  Comments [21]  | 
 Wednesday, August 23, 2006

Yesterday's guest posting on Creative Commons by Clare Christian has generated some interesting comments. Are the risks of undermining traditional copyright protection greater than the benefits? Is traditional copyright unsustainable in this new environment? By NOT embracing the new environment are we in danger of creating a copyright-hostile environment? By embracing the new environment are we simply encouraging copyright piracy? By allowing free access are we undermining the value of intellectual property or are we increasing its reach and hence its importance? These are, I believe, some of the important issues for writers, publishers and retailers today (not whether in the UK we print prices on covers or use stickers!).

I thought you might also be interested in yesterday's improbable letter received by one of the editors at Nature:

You better watch it trying to tell the world that humans evolved from chimps. We didn't - and I will pray for you and ask God to open your eyes to see the ridiculousness of your articles. The Apostle Paul wrote about people like you in the Book of Romans, explaining that due to your rebellion and the refusal to accept God, He has taken away any capacity that you may have had to see Him. Paul explains it as, brilliant men who cannot see the wonders of creation in front of them become morons. Evolution is being ditched, it cannot be proven, and is a perverse religion. You will never find an answer other than God.

Thanks for your time.

Ah well, at least it ended politely.

#    |  Comments [5]  | 
 Tuesday, August 22, 2006

The Friday Project, which I have mentioned before, is experimenting, yet again, with a new business model. I asked Clare Christian of the FP to tell us about it:

Some of you will have already heard of a Creative Commons licence  as many websites and blogs are published under this agreement. There are a number of licences that can be complex in places but essentially a CC licence means that the content provided under that licence can be downloaded for personal and other non-commercial use while the copyright holder remains the author. 

 

Although many publishers will throw up their collective hands in horror at the thought of giving away content (see the ongoing Google debate) is it really such a bad idea?

 

At The Friday Project, we don’t think so. On Monday we released the creative commons edition of Blood, Sweat and Tea, a book based on the blog of Tom Reynolds a London EMT who has been writing about his life and work for the last three years. The publication of the online version coincides with the print edition and we believe that by offering the book in this way we will widen its audience and so increase the potential market for purchases of the print version.

 

Tim O’Reilly once said Obscurity is a far greater threat to authors and creative artists than piracy’ and I agree. Certainly, as far as this book is concerned, obscurity is not a problem. Already the launch of the CC version is generating comment across the web, including the highly influential Boing Boing and the Telegraph blog which states ‘it's encouraging to see a publisher taking such an innovative approach. It's the ones who experiment that will survive the online world, not the ones who stick rigidly to the traditional business models’.

 

Of course, time will tell if we are right or wrong, but what do you think?

 

The creative commons edition of Blood, Sweat and Tea can be found here). Download it, enjoy it – and buy the book too.

 

 

#    |  Comments [10]  | 
 Monday, August 21, 2006

It's not often even in England that cricket makes the front pages. The reason is best summed up in the Guardian or cricinfo report on the test match between Pakistan and England which was meant to finish today but finished yesterday when Pakistan were deemed to have forfeited the game.

For the many people who are uninterested in cricket or don't understand it the essence is that an Australian (and thus apparently neutral) umpire penalised Pakistan for cheating by tampering with the ball illegally. Pakistan were definitely ahead in the match and more likely to win. The Pakistan team then staged a protest by refusing to play and the umpires then declared England the winners. After negotiation the Pakistan team then agreed to play but the umpires 'spat the dummy' and refused to have their prior decision overturned and would not restart the game.

All very silly. But there were (and are) two really unpleasant undertones or suspicions.

The first, I hope, is highly unlikely. Before the cheating penalty England were huge outsiders to win the match with the bookmakers (and a lot of money is gambled on cricket worldwide). Immediately afterwards the odds shortened dramatically. Anyone who bet on England to win on Sunday morning stood to make a large amount of money - which always raises eyebrows in sport.

The second relates to bias. Asian cricket teams have been known to suspect that the umpire in question, Darrell Hair, did them no favours. This particular penalty has never been applied before in international cricket. And so on. The bit that really worries me is that this has happened at a time of acute tension between the West and the Islamic world. Cricket is only a sport but in Pakistan and India it is an obsession. To accuse their players of cheating is a grave insult.

God knows where this will all lead but I think that even non-cricket lovers whould follow the story.

PS An excellent piece on the affair by Andrew Miller.

#    |  Comments [4]  | 
 Sunday, August 20, 2006

I am attending the September annual conference of National Acqusitions Group, which, to quote:

'...exists to create and encourage dialogue and improvements for all involved in the acquisition process. Members include organisations in publishing, bookselling and library systems supply as well as librarians in academic, public, national, special and government institutions.'

In preparation I'm keeping my ears open for library relevant material. I'll be making a presentation on the key issues affecting publishers today and how these may impact on both the public and academic library sector. So please send me anything you think is relevant.

Working with libraries seems to me an essential part of a publisher's support for authors and for dissemination of information as freely as possible. In the midst of the tectonic shake-up of our industry it is vital that the library and librarians remain at the heart of what we do.

#    |  Comments [0]  | 
 Saturday, August 19, 2006

The last few days have seen a renewed flurry about the impossibility of new writers getting published and/or the inequity of the process of selection and/or the inanity of publishers in general and big publishers in particular. I am pasting in a piece by Brian Martin which appeared in this weekend's Financial Times.

Better late than never

By Brian Martin

Published: August 19 2006 03:00 | Last updated: August 19 2006 03:00

There are writers whose work is not published until late in their lives. Fanny Trollope published Domestic Manners of the Americans, her first of more than 40 books, at the age of 52. That was from financial necessity. Her husband had died and she had a family to support. Perhaps her son Anthony gained his discipline of writing, in his case novels, from her. He wrote his first book, The Macdermots of Ballycloran, aged 32, while working for the Post Office.

Earlier this year my first novel, North, was published. There is nothing particularly remarkable about this except that I am 68. Admittedly I had written a couple of academic books, but fiction was new to me. Now I have joined a coterie of novelists who started late: Mary Wesley, who first saw her fiction in print at 70; Charles Chadwick, whose book It's All Right Now appeared when he was 72 - it took him three decades to write; and Marina Lewycka, whose prize-winning novel A Short History of Tractors in Ukrainian was published when she was 58.

My career has been spent teaching. I taught English at the same school in Oxford for 40 years and could have continued for another two, but release was too tempting. (Only one of my predecessors, a Victorian named Brownrigg, exceeded my tenure at the 500-year-old school.) At the same time, over a period of 14 years, I taught English literature at the university. But by 2001 I was free and spent a year contemplating and considering what I should do next.

As it happened Mary Wesley proved an inspiration. I remembered that she had once said: "I have no patience with people who grow old at 60 just because they are entitled to a bus pass. Sixty should be the time to start something new, not put your feet up." For more than 30 years I had been reviewing fiction, first for the New Statesman, then for The Times, Spectator and FT. It occurred to me that I should try my hand at a novel. So, intellectually refreshed by a year of freedom, I turned my attention to writing fiction. Here, Graham Greene was my mentor. I wrote every morning until lunchtime, and only if the mood took me would I return to the typescript. Otherwise, like Dr Johnson (but only in this respect), I was available for tea or coffee. After about 10 months, North was born.

It is certainly not easy to find a publisher in your late sixties. I spent a couple of years approaching agents, finding people who liked what I had written but who doubted its marketing potential. Then I found an innovative fiction-publishing scheme, Macmillan New Writing, which took to North without hesitation, and a deal was struck.

At the same time as trying to find a publisher, I continued to write. At the present time, I have three more novels completed. The publisher David Fickling said to me with characteristic enthusiasm, "Test yourself. If you want to go on writing most of the time, if it's a habit, almost an obsession, then you are a writer in the proper sense."

I reckon I pass the test.

I wrote North because I am interested in the ways people think and behave towards one another. It is a psychological novel, a drama of suspense. Three of the main characters are young. Others are older, professionals, more sceptical and circumspect. All are caught up in the turmoil of emotion and events. The novelists whom I have admired are Greene, Henry James, Joseph Conrad and Iris Murdoch. There is no telling what their influence has been, but the agent Giles Gordon, to whom I showed the North manuscript just before his death, said it reminded him, "at different times of C.P. Snow and Iris Murdoch". I make no such claims, but pay tribute to their craft and power.

Readers should take heart. Even in your sixties, it is not too late to start a new career. A few weeks ago Joanna Trollope, a mature novelist, and Charlotte Mendelson, a young, distinguished newcomer to the art, discussed on the Today programme the contention that novelists should not start writing till they are at least 35 because they lack experience and authority. Naturally, I inclined to Trollope's point of view.

Some journalists have accused Macmillan New Writing of cheapening the publishing process for novels, likening it to Ryanair inasmuch as there are standardised conditions and no advances. The novels it publishes stand or fall on their own merits. When it came to the stage of editing the final page proofs, my editor was on sabbatical in Languedoc. I was flown down to Carcassonne to pass the pages. As my publisher put it, "North goes south on Ryanair."

#    |  Comments [2]  | 
 Friday, August 18, 2006

There are two Barry Turners in Wikipedia. The first one is a Canadian politicians in favour of freedom for ducks and the vital conservation of wetlands in North America. The second is a friend of mine, a former Macmillan employee and a prolific author and editor.

He is the editor of the invaluable and enormous Statesman's Yearbook which improves with every annual edition and this year comes with a free single-user online licence.

He is also celebrating the twentieth birthday of another of his brainchildren The Writer's Handbook which has become the leading resource for professional and would-be professional writers. He has written a piece in the London Times on the difficulties and issues around new writers getting published. Judging by the amount of correspondence I get on this whenever it's mentioned I thought I'd encourage readers to visit the associated debate which is getting a fair response.

I reckon that saving the Canadian wetlands is really important for the world but I reckon that Barry does his bit too.

And a propos ducks I came across a wonderful quote from Colin Haycraft, ex owner of the idiosyncratic publishing house Duckworth, cited (his name wrongly spelt) in the Bookseller magazine by Anthony Cheetham: ' A publisher who writes books is about as much use as a pregnant midwife.' In researching him I also came across his wonderful: 'A publisher is a specialized form of bank or building society, catering for customers who cannot cope with life and are therefore forced to write about it.' Have a good weekend.

#    |  Comments [12]  |