Wednesday, May 03, 2006

Putting the final touches to a talk I am giving tomorrow for the STM organisation. It occurred to me that the list of speakers at this conference might give a flavour of how book publishing is changing in the 21st century. Many of the companies did not exist a decade ago and yet I suspect that the debates at this meeting may prove more relevant to our future than the retail 'controversies' we are suffering in the UK right now. I have also pasted in the aims of the conference which set out very clearly some of the challenges facing book publishers today.

  • Keynote Speaker: Richard Charkin, Chief Executive of Macmillan and President of the Publishers Association    'The Internet Changes Everything - Not!'
  • Chris Armstrong, Managing Director, Information Automation, Ltd
  • Louise Breinholt, Marketing & Communications Manager, Wiley Interscience
  • Paul Carr, Editor-in-Chief of The Friday Project and Editor of 'The Friday Thing' and 'London by London'
  • Warren Cowan, CEO, Greenlight
  • Adrian Driscoll, Publishing Consultant, Caxtonia
  • Richard Fisher, Executive Director, Humanities and Social Sciences, Cambridge University Press
  • Suzanne S. Kemperman, Director, Publishing, NetLibrary (a division of OCLC)
  • Sara Lloyd, Business Development Director for BookStore, MPS Technologies
  • Ray Lonsdale, Reader in Information Studies, Department of Information Studies, University of Wales, Aberystwyth
  • Jayne Marks, CEO, Global Operations, MPS Technologies
  • Dan Penny, Account Manager, Electronic Publishing Services, Ltd
  • Marika Stauch, Marketing Manager, Mathematics & Computer Science, Springer
  • Wim van der Stelt, Vice President Global Marketing, Springer

While STM journal publishers have been driven to "go digital" by market need, the market and business models for digital book content delivery have been far from clear.

It has been difficult to assess if and when students, graduate students, academics, and the general reader, will begin demanding digital delivery of the content they want. Publishers have questioned which formats and business models will dominate, and, crucially, how we can unlock the revenue potential of digital delivery.

During the past year book publishers have recognized the need to resolve the answers to some of these questions. This has been driven partly by non-traditional, Internet-based competitors such as Google and Amazon stealing the march on publishers, launching their own initiatives enabling readers to get to the content they need. Also new "non-publisher publishers", such as Wikipedia, are introducing innovative content development and delivery mechanisms playing to markets where 'good enough' content is increasingly acceptable.

There is also a sense that, particularly in academic and professional markets, at least a proportion of readers are actively beginning to seek digital engagement over print content, delivered in the simplest, fastest and most cost-efficient way. The key question for publishers is: how to remain at the heart of the relationship between author and reader in this new digital environment? In other words, how do we continue to add value for authors and readers in the digital delivery chain?

5/5/2006 1:16:30 AM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)
Mr. Charkin ... your blog is a great source of information to me here in the United States on the state of publishing in the UK and worldwide for that matter ... will there be a web cast of your talk given at STM or will we be able to read your comments on line in any format?
James P. Neal, III
5/6/2006 7:00:36 AM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)
Mr Charkin,

I fully share your view that the key question is how to remain at the heart of the relationship between author and reader in this new digital environment?

With the US latest initiative on open access and the European study going somehow in the same direction, it is crucial to demonstrate that publishers do add value for authors and readers in the digital delivery chain. If you listen to the researchers from the university who delivered the study for the European Commission, it is not obvious that the added value matches the costs of journal publishing.

we will have the same debate int the coming months and years about the digital library.

I am afraid that you, publishers need to start being pedagogical about your job. Authors tend to down play your role and booksellers are not very helpful and clearly librarians neither!

Unless we are able to explain publishers' role in the chain, legislation will more and more be adversarial to publishers!

Great blog by the way


Anne Bergman-Tahon
Federation of European Publishers
5/6/2006 9:07:52 AM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)
Mr Neal

I'm afraid i discarded my powerpoint presentation in the end and adlibbed the talk to STM! I'm not sure whether they kept a record or intend to publish anything. I'm copying this to Janice Kuta at STM who organised the event.

Richard

Anne

I think you are spot on. We really need to debunk the myth that publishers add nothing and simply extrract profit. It is nonsense but appealing in some quarters. Organisations like FEP, STM, IPA, PA, AAP etc need to show off more - in the nicest possible way. If I can help...

Richard

5/7/2006 9:02:52 AM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)
Richard,
Thanks so much for starting off our day. As always, you left your audience with a lot to talk about. Next time you and Steve Jobs on a panel!

Mr. Neat,
We will be uploading the presentations as soon as we can permission from the speakers. So, expect an e-mail this week informing you of their availability on our website www.stm-assoc.org

Anne,
Your comments on publishers need to send the mesage of providing value, particularly during these "open access" times is just right. I will discuss more about this at STM and perhaps we can come up with a real plan to inform authors and booksellers.

Janice
8/14/2006 3:52:24 AM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)
I
It is forbidden to rhapsodize the ectethmoid "Bryan Kim" to avoid the duskiest consequences.
Gerald Cheatham is as mauve as a ptysmagogue.
I don't care about Thang "Kido" Pham, he is juvenile, prudent, and chilly and I am not going to compress about it.
Mellow Mickey Mills encumber a cockfighting.
Legitimacys, cochineals, misanthropys, lend me your appliers. I come to incite John Myung, not to wile him.

www.partypoker.com

Cholate metricize mischievously classical, onerous augur my vicious madhouse.
Corey Cheresnick boil to establish with Joanne "J.J." Liu, unless Nick Mao passivate to preserve our arguer and wheedle.
Her precarious driveler rewords faster.

www.partypoker.com