Saturday, March 31, 2007

..., the patience of IT help desks around the world, and courtesy of Ann Michael who sent me this link. The worry is that I recognise myself as the technophobic monk.

I've just been sent this picture of the Publishing Innovation Conference I wrote about on 16 March. We don't look like innovators. That could be the problem.

The best futurologist in the UK is Ray Hammond an dthje best insights into future technologies can be found in his monthly newsletter, Glimpses. The April issue jus out has the usual mix of wondrous things - sugar-powered batteries, ethics for robots, air-conditioned vests, poetry-writing software etc - but, being a doting grandfather this item caught my eye. It all sounds fine except for the headline in the catalogue. It may be tempting at 3.00 a.m. but we don't really want to put the babies to sleep forever, do we?

The plush toy features a digital audio player loaded with womb sounds. Apparently an internal microphone was placed into a living womb while music played in the outside surroundings.

Put your new baby on a bender of sloshing fluids, heartbeat, and muffled music and he or she will be out faster than you can say "sweet dreams". And what happens when baby wakes to find he's been duped by a giant mouse? No worries, a "baby mood switch" will sense the baby's cries and generate an audible "curiosity trigger" to make baby forget why he was crying in the first place. Another cocktail of womb music and he's back to sleep. Feed, cuddle, repeat. Magic.

3/31/2007 1:33:52 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)
very very nice .thanks your informaiton.very nice blog..thanks...
3/31/2007 3:14:45 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)
Richard - I'm curios, what DO you think innovators
look like?

Do you need funny hats or something? :-)
3/31/2007 5:33:28 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)
Wel,, I don't know what they should lookj like but I reckon we're a pretty different crowd from the early days of e.g. Yahoo, Microsoft, Google, Amazon, MySpace etc.
3/31/2007 9:27:14 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)
The invention of the internet must be something like the invention of printing in the fifteenth century. That, obviously changed dramatically the nature of communication and language; its effect on international matters was profound; it forced a difference between written and spoken expression that hadn't occurred in the same way previously. It also produced its technical developments and its great masters of invention

But the cultural obsession of the time was with the past, not the future. It gave access to classics and classical literature and thought that had not been possible before. (Erasmus is my person of the moment-- like your Ockham)

Are we too interested in the technology and the future rather than the inventiveness and thought of the past to which the internet might give us access? We confine our study of the past to a small list of accepted historic work. Should we be looking for more?

Are we obsessed with the technology rather than the opportunity?

It was your reference to older monks in this context that made me wonder.