Wednesday, March 07, 2007

Yesterday I mentioned that I was off to hear Tony Blair speak on the British creative economy. I waited for a bus to take me there but when it arrived it was full. Immediately behind it was a number 14 which takes me in the direction of my office. I decided to give Tony a miss but here is his speech in full. For those of you who would prefer an abstract, what he said is that arts are important, that before he came to power Britain was in a shocking state culturally, that he invested in the arts which are as a result flourishing as never before, and that he has commissioned a Green Paper which will make things even better. In the words of Macmillan's former Chairman 'You've never had it so good'. I think I may have made the right decision in taking the number 14 bus which passes the great grocery store, Fortnum and Mason on its journey towards the Macmillan offices in Kings Cross.

Fortnum and Mason's Food Court

Yesterday saw Microsoft attack Google for its cavalier approach to copyright as reported here. It is true that Microsoft's dealings with libraries have always been respectful of in-copyright works and it is certainly in Microsoft's interests to support the legal protection of intellectual property. There are those who are suspicious of every move that Microsoft makes but I feel comforted that we publishers seem to have a rather substantial ally in our efforts to protect our authors' rights and a business model which not only rewards creativity but also encourages freedom of expression.

It was fascinating to read that one of Reed's former star authors, Naomi Campbell, is set to start mopping floors. When we published her 1996 novel Swan (Five girls and a dream to die for!) there were those who said that she hadn't actually written the book. Maybe she won't actually mop the floors either. I couldn't find a picture of Naomi in the swan dress she wore for the launch, so here's the book cover instead.

Swan

There has been a debate today about whether independent educational establishments should continue to enjoy charitable (hence tax-free) status. There are apparently new much tougher public benefit tests which the organisations have to prove. There is much information about all this at Charity Commission's website. It will be interesting to see whether some publishers who are exempt from UK corporation tax on the grounds of their educational remit will find the new tests to their liking and how long it takes the Inland Revenue to wake up to this tax-raising opportunity.

3/8/2007 10:21:43 AM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)
Richard,
I don't think publishers have too much to fear from the inland revenue just yet! I taught for 19 years in HMC schools, and although I left for business in 2000, I am still very actively involved in education and am constantly dismayed by the depth and severity of the anti-public school attitudes (and the ignorance about them) I routinely come across at every level. Martin Stephen, High Master of St Paul's, put it well on yesterday's Today programme when he said if independent schools have got things right, maybe the state should learn from that instead of envying it. Snobbery may traditionally have been predicated on ignorance, but in my recent, highly relevant experience, inverted snobbery is predicated on a truly unholy alliance of ignorance and envy.

3/8/2007 11:49:24 AM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)
Joe, I do agree about inverted snobbery. Publishers in general don't need to worry about the Inland Revenue because most pay corporation tax. There a handful, however, who have managed to bypass the net and who use this to gain unfair commercial advantage. No names no pack drill.