Monday, June 26, 2006

I seem to have bored one of our regular visitors by moaning about the airport in Paris. He has a fair point. Whingeing travellers are a pretty boring lot. In mitigation I had spent 10 hours in the air flying to Chennai, a day's solid work and then ten hours back.

But where I disagree with the correspondent is that international travel has nothing to do with understanding book buyers. My critic runs an antiquarian bookshop in middle class England and I have no doubt he understands his clientele. My job is to manage an international publishing house and our most important clients are school teachers and scientists in emerging markets such as India, Latin America and sub-Saharan Africa. The universe in which I travel is very different from Clive Keble's but I'd contend that kids in India represent the real world just as much as traditional book lovers in England - and maybe just maybe it's more important to work on developing these markets than on specialist antiquarian bookselling in Middle England.

Incidentally, who said anything about first class? A rule in Macmillan is that we seek the lowest cost travel wherever feasible.

And finally.... Macmillan's imprint for first novels, Macmillan New Writing, has attracted a great deal of attention, some positive, some negative, but most of it serving only to promote it further with authors and booksellers, all of which is very helpful. But one somewhat amusing trend is now emerging - a stream of submissions from, how shall I put it, 'incarcerated'  individuals, hoping that somehow their artistic endeavours might serve as a 'get out of jail free' card....

I'm posting here a letter recently received at the MNW offices:

"I am an artist and I’ve recently written two (2) books. One of the books is completed the other is still in the works. The completed one is Hot! (Not to toot my own horn) ....

The problem is this- I am incarcerated (since 2004) in a California state prison, on some bogus conviction. Due to the fact that I wasn’t financially able to afford a “real” attorney I was given a court appointed “dump truck” thus the results being a 16 year conviction.

What I offer is this - I will give you the completed book, original manuscript, copy rights, and all the profits from the book sales.

What I want is this – I want a lawyer that can get me out of this position I am in. If he / she can’t get me “out”, at least get me a sentence reduction (although I know nothing in guaranteed through the courts) I want to be recognized as the author and a flat 10.000 ( ten thousand dollars).

So basically there is no loss for your company. To make it even better, I will give you the book in hand, manuscript, copyrights, and al the profits as well as the “author” title for a flat 20.000 (twenty thousand dollars).
That’s without the lawyer.

As you can see my main focus is getting out of prison and/or getting a real lawyer. If that means I have to give up “all” my rights to the book just to get enough money for a lawyer then that’s what I’m willing to do."

Now that's what I call a tempting offer...

 

6/26/2006 9:30:25 AM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)
Well said !
6/26/2006 10:00:09 AM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)
Perhaps I might expand my thoughts.

We are very divided nation - the wealthy Islington or Hackney New Labourites would have little in common with a single mum, doing three jobs, living in social housing in a provincial metropolis, who is determined to try and give her kids a decent start in life. This single mum will often be scrimping and saving the pennies to buy her kids books ; this mum might have one holiday abroad in her lifetime.

Within the next hour I expect a man of my age to come along for a new book which he ordered ; this man is dependent upon community transport. He has walking difficulties, needs a stick, and apart from his roll-ups admits to one other "relief", reading books : he gets transport to "town" once a week, each Monday.

How much sympathy do you think that these book buyers would have for an executive complaining about international travel arrangements ?

If you read my original comments this is the comparison which I was alluding to.
6/26/2006 1:39:10 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)
Clive, You suggested that I loosen up. I don't suppose that the people you mention are in the least bit interested in my travel issues. Nor your issues about publishers' discounts to Google for that matter. And what have Hackney and Islington new labourites to do with anything? This blog was started for people in Macmillan who might be interested in our investments. And the odd moan and the odd joke and the odd byway is hardly a sin. I suggest you lighten your load a bit by disposing of a chip or two from your shoulder. Incidentally I live in neither Hackney nor Islington and I didn't vote new (or any other sort of) labour. And I also believe that we live in a very divided society but the division I think is most important is that between the really poor of the developing world and the rich west, not the relatively small differences between the poor and rich in the UK. But yoyu are absolutely entitled to stick to your views, thank goodness.
richard charkin
6/27/2006 12:56:33 AM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)
Several months ago you linked to my interviews with Faber's Stephen Page and Google's Tom Turvey. Two more along similar lines conducted recently in Washington now reside on my site: one with Canongate's Jamie Byng, the other with Amazon's Greg Greeley.

Tried to provide direct links here...but your system admonished me not to...they can be found at nigelbeale dot com

Thanks for your blog by the way. And for putting me on to Jeff Jarvis's Buzz Machine

And in closing: Glad I'm not Australian today. They were robbed.
6/28/2006 10:54:55 AM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)
Meanwhile, back in the hoosegow,

It's never their fault, is it? "I'm innocent!" "I was railroaded!" "It's my lawyer's fault!" It is exceedingly rare when any convicted criminal shows any sign of maturity and responsibility.

I wouldn't trust any of the manipulative brats without strict adult supervision. Combat trained strict adult supervision.